Comments on: We’re in touch so you be in touch https://www.briankurtz.net/were-in-touch-so-you-be-in-touch/ Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:38:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Wendy https://www.briankurtz.net/were-in-touch-so-you-be-in-touch/#comment-1439 Sun, 05 Jul 2020 19:38:00 +0000 https://www.briankurtz.net/?p=2469#comment-1439 What a great tribute Brian. I know it was one of Claytons favorite promotion combinations anyone ever did and he talked about the genious of it often. Sad so many great men have to leave us. – – Wendy Makepeace

]]> By: Arthur P. Johnson https://www.briankurtz.net/were-in-touch-so-you-be-in-touch/#comment-1438 Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:23:44 +0000 https://www.briankurtz.net/?p=2469#comment-1438 Beautifully said, Brian. I too too great umbrage at the last part of the Times obituary, and tweeted that if the obituary writer had bothered to watch the infomercials, he or she would have met the Nobel Prize Winners who took pride in appearing, including one who too the time off a busy schedule to travel to Arizona State University and speak to the live audience for Ultimate Healing.

One thing you may not have known — know what Hugh wanted to discuss with me in between takes, just for kicks? The reconciliation of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics.

His like will not be seen again, and I was incredibly fortunate that you, Steve Dworman and Marty Edelston cared enough to speak to him about appearing in these infomercials for these books.

P.S. I was stopped on the street frequently about the infomercials and never once did I hear anything but THANK YOU SO MUCH! And I thank you so much for taking the time to write this intelligent and passionate response to the Times Obituary. Hugh was beaming down from his own heavenly residence (we talked about that too, in between takes. What a guy!)

]]>